Judging the frequency or probability of events by how easily examples come to mind, leading to overestimation of vivid, recent, or emotional events.
Doctors who recently saw a rare disease diagnose it more frequently in subsequent patients. People overestimate terrorism risk after media coverage but underestimate heart disease risk despite it being far more common.
If you can easily think of examples, the event must be common—in reality, ease of recall reflects memorability (vividness, recency, emotion) not actual frequency.
Thinking, Fast and Slow
Daniel Kahneman
Fast, automatic, unconscious cognitive processing that operates through pattern recognition and associative memory without deliberate effort.
Ignoring statistical base rates (how common something is in the population) in favor of specific case information or stereotypes.
Why does the availability heuristic lead to overestimation of dramatic risks like terrorism while underestimating mundane risks like heart disease?
True or False: If you can easily think of examples of something, it's probably common.